Users would like to compare different reconstructed slices together. the workflow to achieve this currently is to reconstruct a slices using different filters, then open within the compare image stacks window. The saves slices have non-descriptive names such as Recon, Recon_2 etc. Each slice can't be renames easily within the left dialog of the main window meaning users can lose track of which recon is which.
To improve the descriptions of reconstructed slices, I propose we improve the default name to include the reconstruction method and filter so a user can quickly produce a number of different slices and still have a basic understanding of which reconstructed slice is which for comparison.
Current Behaviour
Reconstructed slice when exported do not have a descriptive name making it hard to compare slices before reconstructing a volume.
Desired Behaviour
Users would like to compare different reconstructed slices together. the workflow to achieve this currently is to reconstruct a slices using different filters, then open within the compare image stacks window. The saves slices have non-descriptive names such as Recon, Recon_2 etc. Each slice can't be renames easily within the left dialog of the main window meaning users can lose track of which recon is which.
To improve the descriptions of reconstructed slices, I propose we improve the default name to include the reconstruction method and filter so a user can quickly produce a number of different slices and still have a basic understanding of which reconstructed slice is which for comparison.
Current Behaviour
Reconstructed slice when exported do not have a descriptive name making it hard to compare slices before reconstructing a volume.