Closed vincerubinetti closed 4 years ago
Creating this issue to remind me to come up with a list of guidelines for how to create a screenshot that is both nice looking, and also consistent with the rest of the screenshots in the catalog.
Great idea. Could probably go in the README here?
we should come up with a more robust, longer-term solution.
I agree that users submitting their own screenshots is there preferred solution! We could even have CI perform some scripted checks on the image.
Great idea. Could probably go in the README here?
Yeah I think it would go as a Making your screenshot
sub-section under Contributing
.
I agree that users submitting their own screenshots is there preferred solution! We could even have CI perform some scripted checks on the image.
I think the only checks that could be automated are that it's a png and that it's 1000x1000.
Follow these guidelines when creating your screenshot to help us maintain a beautiful, consistent, and streamlined catalog. They are listed roughly in order of most strict to least strict.
1000 x 1000 pixels Provide an image exactly 1000 pixels wide by 1000 pixels high. Why do we ask for such a large image when the thumbnails of the papers appear so small in the catalog? 1) Web browsers can use the extra pixels to display a cripser image when zoomed in (especially important on high dpi displays). 2) We may change the layout/design of the catalog at some point, which may show the screenshots at larger sizes. 3) In general, we want to future-proof the catalog against increasing image resolution standards, and for Manubot's own changing needs.
PNG format
Provide your image as a .png
file. This avoids the unsightly artifacts produced by other common image formats while still keeping file size to a minimum.
Select a striking image Select a portion of your manuscript that is interesting and unique. Your screenshot is not expected to accurately capture or explain what your manuscript is about. The purpose of the screenshot is to visually distinguish your paper from other papers, so that readers can easily remember and quickly identify it among many others. As such, the first preference is for a unique, colorful figure, without its caption. If your manuscript has no figures, use an interesting-looking table, code block, or set of equations. If your manuscript has none of those, use any other section that looks unique in some way; more than just a paragraph of black text. If your manuscript is all just plain text, don't provide a screenshot at all; a placeholder thumbnail will be used automatically.
Don't stretch Don't distort the original aspect ratio of your image; not even a little. It looks terrible and is very noticeable. Asymmetrical horizontal and vertical whitespace is much preferable to a stretched image. If you are struggling to meet the dimension requirement, refer to the guidelines on cropping.
Don't scale
You should always create, save, and maintain your figures in vector format where possible. This allows the image to be scaled to any size without loss of quality. If your screenshot source is a vector image, scale it to the required dimensions before converting/rendering it to .png
. Do not, for example, render your vector image to a 800x800 .png
and then scale it up to 1000x1000. If your screenshot has to be a raster image, it still must meet the dimension requirements, and may be rejected by the catalog maintainers if it is noticeably up-scaled.
Don't include paragraph text or captions Text, especially plain black text, serves little to no purpose in a thumbnail. Thumbnails are quick visual identifiers, not snippets of detailed contents. Don't include text in your screenshot, unless it is baked into the figure itself (not its caption), or unless it is necessary per the "striking image" guideline above.
Frame/crop nicely Cropping an image nicely is more of an artform than you might think. As such, it's hard to specify a set of hard/quantifiable rules about what looks good. If you're familiar with frame composition from art/photography/cinematography, the same techniques can be applied here. In addition, here are some general guidelines to follow:
Don't show plugins (irrelevant if submitting a figure directly) Don't show Manubot or third party plugins in your screenshot. The purpose of the thumbnail is to represent your particular paper, not to showcase features of Manubot (there are other places for that). In particular, be mindful to remove the Hypothesis side toolbar, Hypothesis highlights, the table of contents panel, and open tooltips.
Don't show theme decorations (irrelevant if submitting a figure directly) Some Manubot themes show a subtle page border and shadow, meant to represent an actual sheet of paper. Don't include these in your screenshots, or any other theme decoration that will add clutter to the image in its final context. For example, our catalog already adds a shadow to the thumbnails, and it would look ugly to have another shadow within the image itself. These types of effects are intended to be "sugar"/embellishment for the html version of manuscripts only. They're not considered core to the content and functionality of the paper, and thus don't belong in a screenshot. They are also more likely to change as aesthetic trends change. In general, if a piece of styling is stripped away when printing your manuscript, don't include it in your screenshot.
Use default theme, no modifications (irrelevant if submitting a figure directly) To keep the catalog thumbnails consistent, we prefer you use the default Manubot theme when creating your screenshot. We also strongly prefer you make no modifications to the theme you are using for the screenshot, to ensure that sizing and spacing of elements on the page are all in-line with best-practices of graphic design.
If in doubt, look at the other thumbnails in the catalog and model your screenshot off of those.
Closed by #9
Creating a nice screenshot takes a bit of artistic touch. How to crop it, what to include in the shot, and the "composition" of the shot are all things that can't necessarily be quantified.
For the short term, I can do all of the screenshots for papers submitted to the catalog. But we should come up with a more robust, longer-term solution.
Creating this issue to remind me to come up with a list of guidelines for how to create a screenshot that is both nice looking, and also consistent with the rest of the screenshots in the catalog.