Closed harry-gibson closed 8 years ago
I've just tried running this manually. A quick visual inspection suggests that this is all working correctly. There seems to be a lot of records in the osms
data category. I'm not sure it this is a problem, but even if it is I strongly suspect it is a problem with the values in the xwalk spreadsheet, not the code itself.
I'm happy to merge this and deploy it.
New functionality developed on fix_ogr_osm_fields branch gives proper handling of OSM atttributes and translation of these to the output shapefiles.
All tested and ready for review + hopefully merge.