Coverage remained the same at 94.095% when pulling da07395feaad80f4816b68f7b6e4b33f8ea8fbfa on moremaxzoom into 805d115acece01aa1977a0f4ba303bb7977bacf2 on master.
Coverage remained the same at 94.095% when pulling 88cd7d7e097ccee779e75827f9abbced1916c034 on moremaxzoom into 805d115acece01aa1977a0f4ba303bb7977bacf2 on master.
Coverage remained the same at 94.095% when pulling fc48241fa78cf9f12b7f3df9b182f32408cfad8e on moremaxzoom into 805d115acece01aa1977a0f4ba303bb7977bacf2 on master.
Coverage remained the same at 94.095% when pulling f19539c70840f5caa813395a618254d6044eed6b on moremaxzoom into 805d115acece01aa1977a0f4ba303bb7977bacf2 on master.
Coverage remained the same at 94.095% when pulling 3b7b6eeea85b575613ffdf2ecb1dc05f054bb8e1 on moremaxzoom into 805d115acece01aa1977a0f4ba303bb7977bacf2 on master.
Coverage remained the same at 94.095% when pulling 02009b0e95807864207984d211cb4d68979efb4f on moremaxzoom into 805d115acece01aa1977a0f4ba303bb7977bacf2 on master.
refs https://github.com/mapbox/unpacker/issues/852
@dnomadb does this need more
SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS
tests for the new zoom levels?