Closed tmcw closed 10 years ago
Did not help before, but I can benchmark once more before we delete than branch.
Pool would make sense if we were serving out a lot of tiles from the same map/data but it seems like most of the requests will be for one-offs from map/data instances. Worth a test though.
Agree @yhahn - not going to help and I don't think its worth testing. 60% of time is now in geojson parsing, with on 1% in acual XML parsing. Because the geojson is stored in-memory as part of the map object pooling maps would cache the geojson, but we'll not benefit from that.
@springmeyer does it make sense to use mapnik-pool with this module? would that give a perf boost?