mapme-initiative / mapme.biodiversity

Efficient analysis of spatial biodiversity datasets for global portfolios
https://mapme-initiative.github.io/mapme.biodiversity/
GNU General Public License v3.0
25 stars 7 forks source link

Carbon Storage in Protected Areas #160

Closed Jo-Schie closed 2 months ago

Jo-Schie commented 1 year ago

Definition of reasearch question:

How much carbon is stored in the total biomass in protected areas.

Total carbon can be conceptualized as a sum of aboveground, belowground and soilcarbon. See also the DOPA Factsheets here, here and here.

Purposes:

Definition of indicator

Sum of carbon (metric tons) stored in living and dead biomass within an AOI.

Possible data-sources See above the DOPA sources. Not sure if there is already time-series available. ESA will have some sophisticated data starting around 2024/2025 see here. Besides a refreshed review on literature would be necessary because I think the DOPA stuff is outdated.

Side-Note: There are also authors arguing to focus on irreceveroable carbon, which is carbon that if once released to the atmosphere cannot be reabsorbed e.g. by vegetation recovery.... see here. I think it is a valid point but would be only come after having plausible numbers on "normal" carbon.

spatial and temporal resolutions available tbd

other available R packages or routines that could help for code development tbd

Jo-Schie commented 1 year ago

@fBedecarrats and @melvinhlwong : could you please comment on the value of this indicator from your point of view?

Jo-Schie commented 1 year ago

@goergen95 : If you have some time in between assignments. Could you have a look on potential data-sources (availability and access but also from the conceptual angle)?

vuillota commented 1 year ago

I had a look to this recent article where authors estimate the amount of above-ground carbon stored in PAs, and compare it to the storage in non-PAs. They use the publicly available data from NASA, and have a 1km spatial resolution for above-ground carbon density. The area covers +/- 52° latitude. The data are collected since 2018, and authors generate a map for the year 2020 in their article. Maybe this can be an interesting source of data, for above-ground carbon at least !

Jo-Schie commented 1 year ago

Cool. Thanks for the advice @vuillota 😃

Jo-Schie commented 1 year ago

Thanks for the hint @vuillota 😃

goergen95 commented 1 year ago

Thanks for the suggestion. Please note that the authors use data from the GEDI mission. To my understanding, because the sensor is mounted to the ISS, data is only available for about 70% of pixels of between +/- 50° latitude. As such, I don't think it is suitable to be included in the package. However, there might be interesting derived products (see e.g. here a study by Meta folks to derive canopy height models using GEDI data to construct a reference data set).

goergen95 commented 11 months ago

I took a look at the resources you linked @Jo-Schie. DOPA processes all three types of carbon storage on the protected area, eco-region, and national level.

I was not successful downloading any raw data from DOPA, yet. I think that it will be very hard in the foreseeable future to find ready-to-use data sets on these three indicators with a yearly cadence. We could think about replicating DOPA analysis with the data layers we already have in the package.

karpfen commented 11 months ago

@goergen95 you can access the DOPA raw data on the WDPA region level like this:

url <- "https://dopa-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa40/protected_sites/get_wdpa_all_inds?format=csv&wdpaid=666"
dat <- read.csv(text = readLines(url, warn = FALSE), sep = "|")

This only gives a single result per WDPA region and no time series, so I guess this is of limited use.

goergen95 commented 10 months ago

I just had another look at the Noon et al. paper's methodology and my understanding is that the category 'manageable carbon' is the total sum of carbon:

(2) Create a ‘total manageable carbon’ map for terrestrial and coastal ecosystems. This includes aboveground biomass carbon (AGC), belowground biomass carbon (BGC) and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks.

These layers, together with the vulnerable and irrecoverable data layers are available for download here, even-though only differentiating between biomass and soil carbon (so we could not differentiate between AGC and BGC).

Here is an online viewer of the data.

goergen95 commented 2 months ago

Carbon layers of Noon et al. implemented in mapme.indicators.