Closed karpfen closed 4 months ago
GSW indicators are finished and included in the mapme package now (see https://github.com/mapme-initiative/mapme.biodiversity/pull/235).
Just realised that the resources are called global_surface_water_*
whereas the indicators are called gsw_*.
Would you mind applying the abbreviation? If we do it simply, we would have resources and indicators with the same name (which is not a problem from the technical standpoint, I guess) but maybe we also could think of a smarter way to name things :laughing: Its not just the GSW resource, but applies to others as well... You have any ideas?
Well, yeah, if we think of #232 it might actually be a problem in the future...
I think I'll open a new issue for renaming things, because I feel that will be a bigger one and I have some ideas already.
@karpfen, the GSW resources currently lack proper documentation. Could you please provide them?
@goergen95 sorry, I must have missed your comment, just saw it. I documented the individual indicators in their respective .calc* functions (e.g. https://github.com/mapme-initiative/mapme.biodiversity/blob/main/R/calc_gsw_occurrence.R#L3), is that what you mean?
The global surface water data are available via their website. The aim is to include a selection of them in the package, namely
DoD:
Update 2024-02-19