Side-by-side BioPortal/OntoPortal format - SSSOM comparison

mapping-commons / sssom

Simple Standard for Sharing Ontology Mappings

https://mapping-commons.github.io/sssom/

BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License

154 stars 24 forks source link

Side-by-side BioPortal/OntoPortal format - SSSOM comparison #168

Open jonquet opened 2 years ago

jonquet commented 2 years ago

This is similar to #147

We have started such a process in AgroPortal : https://github.com/agroportal/project-management/issues/265 CC @graybeal

matentzn commented 2 years ago

This is great, thank you @jonquet !

cmungall commented 2 years ago

If it helps @pkalita-lbl implemented code that takes the bioportal payload and converts to SSSOM objects:

https://github.com/INCATools/ontology-access-kit/blob/main/src/oaklib/implementations/bioportal/bioportal_implementation.py#L134-L167

tayeb83 commented 2 years ago

For the SMT(https://smt.esante.gouv.fr/) we ask the same question on what good representation of mapping will be useful in OWL : EDOAL or SSSOM. we can work together ?

matentzn commented 2 years ago

Sounds great @tayeb83!

We can import at least simple mappings in EDOAL into SSSOM - generally it depends what kind of metadata you need to keep and what use cases you serve. Can you describe a bit what kinds of mappings you are curating?