Closed paulkernfeld closed 8 years ago
Thanks for this. If you change the scope from webcoin
to webcoin:bridge
I'll merge this. I do think debug statements are good, but there is definitely such a thing as too many. We'll have to mess around with it and find a good balance that gives us meaningful logs without too much noise.
BTW, I plan on breaking the bridge code out into its own repo (named bitcoin-web-bridge
).
Yup, I agree with avoiding too much clutter. Just let me know if this is too noisy.
This is probably OK since the bridge code is mostly run on its own.
This helped me in tracking down issue #5. Do you think this is a good direction? If so, I'm happy to add more debug statements.