Closed migurski closed 8 years ago
lol
Now looks like:
@souperneon thoughts?
@migurski can you do that sign in magic again so i can see this page :) 🎶 Heroku don't let me sign in 🎶
Try now, @souperneon? https://mapzen-odes-extracts-pr-225.herokuapp.com/odes/extracts
How about – ( we can also put the updating extract part in a blue box if we want to highlight it more)
Questions –
Deferring 1) to @migurski, personally I think it's fine to leave it available as an option whenever.
2) I think it would replace the old extract, keeping it as the same row. 3) I would love to add this feature in the table view.
@souperneon I'm ok with the content that you proposed above, but could you please go over this again with some thought about hierarchy and consistency of style? It doesn't follow the same bold/un-bold conventions as above in the page, and I would like to avoid 5 different text treatments in one section.
It should always be there; otherwise we'll have to explain when it's not.
1) Great. Available as soon as the extract gets created and the download links are ready. 👍 2) This can be confusing. @binx are you imagining it moving to the top item in the table when that happens? Is it bad to just add it as a brand new extract as a new line in the table? I can imagine people doing analysis on changed data as a use case. But could go either way, as long as the recentest extract is on top of the table. 3) I'll make an issue for that. It will require some front-end magic :)
For the styling, everything is in line with the rest of the page (except the created date which can be the same as the rest of the text). I used the italics as the 'note' style that we are using in other places in the experience. Will it be simpler to put the whole thing in a blue box? I'm not sure how much attention we want to draw to it.
@binx i see the old copy on the live site.
If we can just change the second line (after the date) to read: Need an updated version of this extract with the latest OpenStreetMap data and the same boundaries? GET _ EXTRACT
Should I make a new issue with this?
Closes #194. Looks like: