Because the added value of having this was very small, and I don't want to confuse people about what's properly supported, I've removed the SVG package. As #196 showed, there can easily be conflicts between HTML and SVG, and the rendering isn't really set up for anything else than HTML.
It's still easy to create SVG elements: html.SVG exists in this repo, and the rest is often just a string that can be included using g.Raw.
Because the added value of having this was very small, and I don't want to confuse people about what's properly supported, I've removed the SVG package. As #196 showed, there can easily be conflicts between HTML and SVG, and the rendering isn't really set up for anything else than HTML.
It's still easy to create SVG elements:
html.SVGexists in this repo, and the rest is often just a string that can be included usingg.Raw.Fixes #206