In recent MOM vs POP MARBL comparison runs, I noticed that photoC_NO3_TOT_zint_100m is all zeros.
Digging into the code and commit history, I see that I added a declaration for photoC_NO3_TOT_zint_100m in e7deac50, but did not add code to compute the diagnostic.
I guess we haven't looked at this diagnostic. It is not a CMIP diagnostic, while the related diagnostic photoC_NO3_TOT_zint is.
I'm not sure if we should remove photoC_NO3_TOT_zint_100m or add code to compute it.
I'm leaning towards the former, given that this issue hasn't been noticed in the 4 years since the diagnostic was added.
In recent MOM vs POP MARBL comparison runs, I noticed that
photoC_NO3_TOT_zint_100mis all zeros.Digging into the code and commit history, I see that I added a declaration for
photoC_NO3_TOT_zint_100min e7deac50, but did not add code to compute the diagnostic.I guess we haven't looked at this diagnostic. It is not a CMIP diagnostic, while the related diagnostic
photoC_NO3_TOT_zintis.I'm not sure if we should remove
photoC_NO3_TOT_zint_100mor add code to compute it.I'm leaning towards the former, given that this issue hasn't been noticed in the 4 years since the diagnostic was added.