Open mnlevy1981 opened 1 year ago
Note we can back this out with
zoo_loss(zoo_ind,:) - zoo_loss_basal(zoo_ind,:) - zooplankton_settings(zoo_ind)%z_mort_0 * (zoo_loss_basal(zoo_ind,:) / zooplankton_settings(zoo_ind)%basal_respiration_rate)
which is equivalent to
zoo_loss(zoo_ind,:) - zoo_loss_basal(zoo_ind,:) * (c1 + zooplankton_settings(zoo_ind)%z_mort_0 / zooplankton_settings(zoo_ind)%basal_respiration_rate)
but we don't have zoo_loss_basal_zint_150m
@cpetrik asked @kristenkrumhardt and I if it would be possible to split up the computation in
compute_Zprime()
a little moreso that the
zooplankton_settings(zoo_ind)%z_mort2_0 * Zprime(zoo_ind,:)**zoo_mort2_exp) * Tfunc_zoo(zoo_ind,:)
term could be provided as a diagnostic (this would be helpful for forcing FEISTY). I think it would just require adding one more term tozooplankton_derived_terms_type
and then updatingmarbl_diagnostics_mod.F90
anddiagnostics_latest.yaml
to write it out.