Open jlinmod opened 4 months ago
@jlinmod -- sorry for the delayed response. The Zhang et al. paper offers two different values for the temperature coeffficient when computing eps_aq_g
. In the abstract, they use -0.0049
as you did:
However, in Figure 2 they use 0.0049
as in the current version of the code:
Further, the slope of the line in Figure 2 is positive, which makes us think that the figure caption is the correct value to use.
Rather than close this PR, could you revert line 155 to drop the minus sign? I think the clean-up you did to the comments is valuable and we'd be happy to bring those changes in.
comment and eps_aq_g equation fix