refactor: remove email sending to user

[sajdakabir]

What did you ship?

Fixes:

• [ ] #XXX (GitHub issue number)
• [ ] MAR-XXX (Linear issue number - should be visible at the bottom of the GitHub issue description)

Checklist:

• [ ] I have self-reviewed the code (A decent size PR without self-review might be rejected)
• [ ] I pinky swear that my codes gonna work as I have testing every possible scenario.
• [ ] I ignored Coderabbit suggestion because it does not make any sense.
• [ ] I took Coderabbit suggestion under consideration as some of it makes sense.
• [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.

OR:

• [ ] shut up and let me cook.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

## Walkthrough The changes made in this pull request involve modifications to the `auth.controller.js` file, specifically within the `authenticateWithGoogleController` and `authenticateWithGithubController` functions. The primary alteration is the removal of the code that sends an event to the Loops service for email confirmation after user creation. This includes the deletion of an `axios.post` request that previously sent user data to the Loops API. Error handling and other functionalities remain unchanged. ## Changes | File Path | Change Summary | |----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | apps/backend/src/controllers/core/auth.controller.js | Removed `axios.post` request for Loops API email confirmation in `authenticateWithGoogleController` and `authenticateWithGithubController`; error handling remains intact. | ## Possibly related PRs - **#444**: This PR modifies the `authenticateWithGoogleController` function in `auth.controller.js`, focusing on error handling and job management in the `spaceQueue`. - **#447**: Similar to the main PR, this PR involves changes to the `authenticateWithGoogleController` function, enhancing logging and error handling while introducing job configuration for the `spaceQueue`. > 🐇 In the code where the events would flow, > A line was removed, and now it won’t show. > The tokens still check, and errors still call, > But Loops no longer gets a message at all. > With changes so slight, the structure stays bright, > A hop in the code, everything feels right! 🐇

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[github-actions[bot]]

Hey there! 👋

We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification.

Valid types:

• feat: A new feature
• fix: A bug fix
• docs: Documentation only changes
• style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code
• refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
• perf: A code change that improves performance
• test: Adding missing or correcting existing tests
• build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
• ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
• chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
• revert: Reverts a previous commit

Format: type: description

Error details:

Unknown release type "refactor" found in pull request title "refactor: remove email sending to user". 

Available types:
 - feat
 - fix
 - docs
 - ui
 - refac
 - perf
 - test
 - build
 - ci
 - chore
 - revert