Closed marcoferrer closed 5 years ago
:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
develop@3f970a8
). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #43 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage ? 89.09%
Complexity ? 19
==========================================
Files ? 15
Lines ? 266
Branches ? 37
==========================================
Hits ? 237
Misses ? 10
Partials ? 19
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | Complexity Δ | |
---|---|---|---|
...ub/marcoferrer/krotoplus/coroutines/StubSupport.kt | 100% <100%> (ø) |
0 <0> (?) |
|
...errer/krotoplus/coroutines/CoroutineCallOptions.kt | 100% <100%> (ø) |
0 <0> (?) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3f970a8...2827b83. Read the comment docs.
Stubs implementing
CoroutineScope
have proven to cause issues with ambiguous scope resolution. To reduce error prone client code, we are removingCoroutineScope
as a super interface from generated stubs. In addition, a new ext toCoroutineScope
has been added callednewGrpcStub
. This is meant to represent the clear intent of launching children within the stub using the context of receiving scope.