Closed sauldhernandez closed 5 years ago
:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
master@f8032c4
). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #51 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 88.12%
Complexity ? 19
=========================================
Files ? 15
Lines ? 278
Branches ? 37
=========================================
Hits ? 245
Misses ? 14
Partials ? 19
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f8032c4...44bee9e. Read the comment docs.
Thanks for the contribution, this was a great catch. Would you mind adding a test sample for the previously failing proto to the test api module? And a very basic unit test in generator tests module. Something as simple as calling the fixed builder. This way the compiler can catch any regressions
Hi! I started to use this library not too long ago, great work!
So, I ran into a strange duplicate class error when using the protobuf builders generator, and having
option java_multiple_files = true
, compilation would fail whenever I have a message with a mapped field:I tracked down the error to a generated
object Mapped
with no elements. Looking into the code I realized that it was generated there, but the filter didn't take into account map definitions (as is in other places in the generator)I tested it and seems to solve the issue, test pass, but I don't know if there's anything else I should change.