Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Updated patch with a two error corrections
Original comment by zorknika@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2011 at 2:17
Attachments:
Thanks zorknika. I confess I've not done patches in Eclipse before, but I noted
the patch shows: CKEditorConfig.java (revision 88)
Yet my copy seems to be version 85.
Do you really need the "get" methods? I know that's javabeans and all, but this
config object doesn't include such getters except for those few elements that
are not set via the inPageConfig JS (they are used to query the object to set
other objects during editor setup).
I'm happy to add it all, but checking to determine if you really need the
getSkin(), getToolbarStartupExpanded(), getFilebrowserFlashBrowseLinkUrl(),
getFilebrowserImageBrowseLinkUrl(). We normally pass in the config object and
then never query it again, but if there's a need to query, I may bite the
bullet and make all of the others have getters too.
Original comment by yoz...@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2011 at 6:45
Original comment by yoz...@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2011 at 6:45
Also, can I confirm that filebrowserFlashBrowseLinkUrl and
filebrowserLinkBrowseUrl are valid, working ckeditor config options?
I know the documentation is not always up to date, but I don't see those listed
http://docs.cksource.com/ckeditor_api/symbols/CKEDITOR.config.html
It looks like I'll also change stylesCombo_stylesSet to stylesSet as I hadn't
noticed this changed back in 3.3.
Original comment by yoz...@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2011 at 7:04
The two option actually work and are not documented.
http://cksource.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=22386
André
Original comment by zorknika@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2011 at 8:57
Okay, we'll add them in, and we'll remove the get methods from the config class
since it's not really a bean -- that is, once you pass it to the editor field
constructor, it's never used again. You just set the values then pass it in and
forget about it -- if you change the values it'll have no effect on the editor
already created, though you could probably pass it in to another editor -- but
why?
Thanks for the addition. It'll be in the 1.4 release once we test our side.
Original comment by yoz...@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2011 at 5:20
Thanks (And of course you are right about the getXY methods ;)
Original comment by zorknika@gmail.com
on 15 Jun 2011 at 2:26
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
zorknika@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2011 at 1:24Attachments: