Open Susensio opened 11 months ago
hey there! bin supports xz
. Seems like what's happening here is that our filtering logic is not picking up the correct files for some reason. If you run bin install -a https://github.com/helix-editor/helix
, you should be able to manually pick the release.
Do you mind editing the title of the issue so we can work on a fix? :pray:
Done. How can I help? Can you reproduce the bug?
Output with debug enabled
• debug logs enabled, version: 0.17.2
commit: f7265c40a7b245a698a7eee603234ece8e1c7c86
built at: 2023-10-03T08:53:00Z
built by: goreleaser
• Config directory is: /home/susensio/.config/bin
• Download path set to /home/susensio/.local/bin
• Getting latest release for helix-editor/helix
• Keeping helix-23.10-x86_64.AppImage.zsync (URL https://api.github.com/repos/helix-editor/helix/releases/assets/132321490) with highest score 26
• Keeping helix-23.10-x86_64.AppImage (URL https://api.github.com/repos/helix-editor/helix/releases/assets/132321501) with highest score 26
• Removing helix-23.10-x86_64-windows.zip (URL https://api.github.com/repos/helix-editor/helix/releases/assets/132321505) with score 11 lower than 26
• Removing helix-23.10-x86_64-macos.tar.xz (URL https://api.github.com/repos/helix-editor/helix/releases/assets/132321509) with score 11 lower than 26
• Removing helix-23.10-x86_64-linux.tar.xz (URL https://api.github.com/repos/helix-editor/helix/releases/assets/132321515) with score 21 lower than 26
• Removing helix-23.10-source.tar.xz (URL https://api.github.com/repos/helix-editor/helix/releases/assets/132321525) with score 1 lower than 26
• Removing helix-23.10-aarch64-macos.tar.xz (URL https://api.github.com/repos/helix-editor/helix/releases/assets/132321530) with score 6 lower than 26
• Removing helix-23.10-aarch64-linux.tar.xz (URL https://api.github.com/repos/helix-editor/helix/releases/assets/132321531) with score 16 lower than 26
Multiple matches found, please select one:
[1] helix-23.10-x86_64.AppImage
[2] helix-23.10-x86_64.AppImage.zsync
Select an option:
My machine specs:
OS: Debian GNU/Linux trixie/sid x86_64
Kernel: 6.5.0-4-amd64
Packages: 3347 (dpkg), 7 (flatpak), 1 (cargo), 5 (snap)
Shell: fish 3.6.1
DE: GNOME 44.5 (wayland)
WM: Mutter
WM Theme: Adwaita
Terminal: tmux
Done. How can I help? Can you reproduce the bug?
yes, I can reproduce the bug. As commented above, if you do bin install -a https://github.com/helix-editor/helix
bin will allow you the select the corresponding xz
file.
Done. How can I help? Can you reproduce the bug?
yes, I can reproduce the bug. As commented above, if you do
bin install -a https://github.com/helix-editor/helix
bin will allow you the select the correspondingxz
file.
Yes I did it and it worked perfectly. Thank you.
I have a question about bin internals. Is this info about what resource is being selected stored somewhere? That is, in a future bin update
, does it remember what selection I made and what binary to use?
I have a question about bin internals. Is this info about what resource is being selected stored somewhere? That is, in a future
bin update
, does it remember what selection I made and what binary to use?
yes, if you run bin --debug
at the very top you'll see here the config directory is placed.
It's similar for fish-shell
$ bin --debug i github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell
• debug logs enabled, version: 0.18.0
commit: 91ae3e63bc1e2a499a832ba5f4e44d3c071b1345
built at: 2024-07-15T03:21:39Z
built by: goreleaser
• Config directory is: $HOME/.config/bin
• Download path set to $HOME/.local/bin
• Getting latest release for fish-shell/fish-shell
⨯ command failed error=Could not find any compatible files
$ bin --debug i -a github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell
• debug logs enabled, version: 0.18.0
commit: 91ae3e63bc1e2a499a832ba5f4e44d3c071b1345
built at: 2024-07-15T03:21:39Z
built by: goreleaser
• Config directory is: $HOME/.config/bin
• Download path set to $HOME/.local/bin
• Getting latest release for fish-shell/fish-shell
• --all flag was supplied, skipping scoring
Multiple matches found, please select one:
[1] fish-3.7.1.app.zip
[2] fish-3.7.1.pkg
[3] fish-3.7.1.tar.xz
[4] fish-3.7.1.tar.xz.asc
It's similar for fish-shell
In this case I think the "Could not find any compatible files" makes a bit more sense given that bin
could not automatically select a given that the user could perfectly chose between the zip
, pkg
org xz
one.
Having said that, I think it would be reasonable to fallback to manual selection - same as supplying -a
- if a match could not be found.
@yozachar WDYT?
Having said that, I think it would be reasonable to fallback to manual selection - same as supplying -a - if a match could not be found.
@yozachar WDYT?
Yes, that sounds right. The -a
flag could be counted redundant, after it's function becomes the default fallback. But this behavior must not hamper, debugging the scoring
logic, if and when required.
As for github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell
, a solution to https://github.com/marcosnils/bin/issues/109 is befitting.
I'm trying to install
helix
from https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/releases but I get no proper matches, I think it could be due to being compressed intar.xz