Closed zycliao closed 11 months ago
Hi @zycliao, thank you for your interest in our work!
Could you specify what exactly is not meeting your expectations? The shape of the panels is close to GT, and they are placed +/- correctly relative to the body. Stitches are quite bad, but, as reported in the paper, the stitch prediction on unseen types is, unfortunately, not ideal:
So, I would say that the presented example would match my expectations 🤔
For reference, this is the GT pattern from a garment in question
To double-check if your setup is correct, may I ask you to run the evaluation script to see if the accuracy numbers on your installation are similar to the ones reported in the paper? The command is as follows, running from the directory root:
python nn/evaluation_scripts/on_test_set.py -sh models/att/att.yaml -st models/att/stitch_model.yaml --unseen
Please, report the numbers that you will get
@maria-korosteleva Thanks for your reply. I was mainly concerned about the stitch (the blue lines in my screenshot). They look totally different from GT. And after the simulation, it becomes a mess.
Yes, please, report the results on stitches accuracy from the evaluation script, as I requested above, to double-check that the setup is correct
If you have a need to use this specific prediction in the downstream application, you can adjust (add/remove) the stitches manually following Qualoth's manual
Hi, thanks for the amazing work. I'm trying to test the pre-trained model on the official dataset. However, the result looks bad. I'm wondering if I did anything wrong.
Basically, I used the pre-trained weights and tested on a few garments provided by the dataset. I ran
but after importing it into Garment Viewer in Maya, the result was
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25116439/221568183-bb939dfe-b633-4333-97f1-62bfa1434cab.png)
predict_per_example.py
with the default configurations. For example, when I testedgarment_pattern/dress_150/dress_2Q19HWLQ83/dress_2Q19HWLQ83_sim.obj
, the result was as below,