Closed attila-lendvai closed 3 years ago
As I recall, a couple of people wanted one name, a couple wanted the other name. I do not care and as a potential backwards incompatible change to downstream, I have no issue leaving it in and removing the "deprecated" notation.
Happy for you to patch to-sql-string whichever way you prefer.
do you mean to open a PR? i'm not coding much in CL nowadays, therefore i'd prefer to leave it to someone who does and can properly test things.
i suggest to use the write-ratio-as-floating-point
name. the reasoning: it's called from a single place that dispatches on the ratio type.
i see no reason to keep including the other one. there are no calls to it from inside the project, and it's not an exported function.
don't forget to also remove the tests.
Done
...as opposed to
write-ratio-as-floating-point
.is that intentional? if so, then why was
write-ratio-as-floating-point
added at all?or is the switching over scheduled for the future, as a potentially backwards incompatible change?