Closed k7sleeper closed 10 years ago
The particle name
is currently necessary when extending or overriding particles. In general it is good to force the naming for components, in the future that might be expanded to specify also the version and provide dependency checking at "startup" time, but that's just brainstorming.
Do I understand it right that the
name
property inparticle.json
is only for distinguishing a particle container (= a particle with subparticles) from a particle with modules?