Closed unicast closed 7 years ago
So, the way pgsanity works it isn't actually doing any of the validation itself. It's leveraging ecpg which comes with postgresql. As far as I know there isn't a great way to add redshift support to pgsanity for exactly this reason; ecpg doesn't know about redshift. Is the syntax really that different? I guess it doesn't matter how different it is; if it's different at all you'll get a lot of false positives from pgsanity.
Ah, ok, got it.
Actually it turns out the main difference is about DDL, e.g. encode
for columns http://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/t_Compressing_data_on_disk.html and system calls like vacuum delete
, the rest looks fine, thank you!
Any way I can contribute?