FoRAGE - typos in Original.y (or Original.x)

[marknovak]

98 | Dor et al 2014 ENVIRON ENTOMOL. 37 seems too high

[marknovak]

The 2nd row 296 | Sing & Arbogast 2008 ENT EXP APPL 31.50 is far too high

[marknovak]

The 15th and 16th rows 335-Nagai & Yano 2000 Looks like it might be original.x that is mistyped 19 seems incorrect probably 49

[marknovak]

2nd of 632 | Dumont et al 1994 INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF HYDROBIOLOGY ought to be checked. doesn't seem like digitization error.

In fact, all these should be checked as well. "635-Dumont et al 1994" "636-Dumont et al 1994" "637-Dumont et al 1994"

[marknovak]

2nd of 296 | Sing & Arbogast 2008 ENT EXP APPL is likely an order-of-magnitude too high.

[marknovak]

Last row of 917 | Kustutan & Cakmak 2009 TURK J AGRIC FOR is likely an order-of-magnitude too high.

[marknovak]

First row of 966 | Smith, 1973, Univeristy of British Colombia 1988 typo likely

[marknovak]

1153 | He et al 2012 ECOTOXICOLOGY Original.x of 60 likely incorrect

[marknovak]

1645 | Porter et al 1982 LIMNO OCEANO Lowest original.x likely incorrect.

[marknovak]

First line of 2086 | Song and Heong 1997 RES POP ECOL

[marknovak]

2091 | Bazgir et al 2020 ACAROLOGIA Original.y of 399 should be 39

[marknovak]

First line of 2283 | Selander and Tiselius 2003 MAR BIOL Likely off by an order-of-magnitude

[marknovak]

First line of 2363 | Huffaker and Matsumoto 1982 RES POP ECOL Likely off by an order-of-magnitude

[marknovak]

First line of 1645 | Porter et al 1982 LIMNO OCEANO possibly off by an order-of-magnitude

[marknovak]

First line of 1439 Fitzsimons et al 2006 is orders of magnitude lower than rest

[marknovak]

2174 | Papanikolaou et al 2020 ECOL EVOL Original.x of 969 should be 96

[marknovak]

2250 | Zalewski et al 1995 ANN ZOOL FENN highest original.x seems very high

[marknovak]

v4 2887 Khan et al 2023 Original.y entry of 8.9.0 Foraging.rate is likewise affected