Alternative verification API

[hseeberger]

I don't like giving the mock as an argument to the verification methods, e.g. one(m) in the following snippet from the examples:

there.was.one(m).baz(any[Int])

Maybe something like the following reads more nicely?

m had one(baz(any[Int])) // or maybe received instead of had?

[markus1189]

That definitely reads more nicely, but we would have to seriously bend the rules to achieve this.

Currently one(m) returns m's type, so we can call .baz on it, but in the example above the invocation of baz is not on m...