Closed XixiLiu95 closed 3 years ago
Hey!
Could You please refer to the script, where You found this line?
All the best, Markus
If you open the NN_calibration/scripts/calibration/Reliability Diagram.ipynb, the section of reliability diagrams as subgraph, the second line of code in function ref_diagram_sub(), you will find it.
Thanks for referring to the line and asking the question!
The variable "acc_conf" consists of accuracies and the confidences of bins. The sorting is done on the first axis (axis=1), so it sorts the accuracy and confidence bin-wise. It is done so the lower value can be used for the blue bar and the higher value for the gap (red bar). So indeed it is not the best way to visualize confidences and accuracies, as it loses the information, which one is which.
I have improved the code for the reliability diagram [here].(https://github.com/dirichletcal/experiments_dnn/blob/master/scripts/notebooks/Reliability%20Diagrams%20of%20Dirichlet%20(Figure%201%20and%20Supp.%20Figure%2012).ipynb)
Hi Markus, Thanks for your response!
Using sort(axis=1) means that you will switch the accuracy-confidence pair if confidence is lower than the accuracy. Moreover, blue columns represent averaged accuracy in the specific confidence interval. Therefore, it is confusing if you switch them. I guess commenting that line of code and changing the name "gap" to "averaged confidence " and "outputs" to "averaged accuracy" is better.
Best, Xixi
This might be a mistake... it does not make sense that you sort it...