Mark sentinel entry as follow-up

markusrt / NRZMyk

The National Reference Center for Invasive Fungal Infections (NRZMyk) is the central contact point for diagnostics and management of invasive fungal infections.

https://www.nrz-myk.de

MIT License

0 stars 1 forks source link

Mark sentinel entry as follow-up #90

Open markusrt opened 2 years ago

markusrt commented 2 years ago

Usually when a patient is treated due to an infection several isolates are taken (i.e. every day for 5-6 days). For Sentinel Network only the first one is relevant as they would all yield the same result.

However sometimes a patient returns after more then 14 days. In these cases an new entry should be added to the database but it should be possible to mark it as follow-up in case it is still the same infection.

[x] A checkbox "follow-up" allows to mark an entry as such
[x] If checked "yes" the user needs to enter a valid laboratory number of a predecessor entry
[x] Follow-up laboratory number field supports type-ahead
[ ] @MaxAldejohann has identified follow-up cases in current production data
[ ] Existing data is marked accordingly
[x] Export contains a new sheet follow-up isolates
[x] New sheet contains an additional column "follow up of" which refers the the previous sentinel number

markusrt commented 2 years ago

@MaxAldejohann Looking into this issue raised a question:

Let's assume we have isolate 2022-004 in our database. Then later a new entry is created with 2022-008, setting the follow-up to 2022-004. If later yet another entry arrives, e.g. 2022-016 would this then be marked as follow-up to 008 or to 004. Or should this be decided by the user?

markusrt commented 2 years ago

@MaxAldejohann / @JuliaWall this enhancement is now available on staging system. Please take a look/test there 🧪 and let me know if it's ready for production.

MaxAldejohann commented 2 years ago

@markusrt nicely done! Just 2 comments: i would seperate the follow up isolates in a new working sheet when it comes to exportation of the excel list, sothat they are clearly apart. I would ammend "Labornummer Vorgänger" to "SN-Labornummer Vorgänger" to avoid confusion with "Labornummer Einsender" :-)

markusrt commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the feedback. Splitting to different sheets makes sense. I will change it accordingly.

markusrt commented 1 year ago

@MaxAldejohann: I just did some housekeeping on our issues and found this still being open. Follow-ups are available since the April release, however old data is not yet sanitized. We discussed that you do the following:

Identify follow-up cases in current production data

Is this actually possible. If yes, you may send me the follow-up sentinel pairs so I can update the database accordingly.

MaxAldejohann commented 1 year ago

ok. my job. will do so asap. but some data is still lacking.