The notion of a "name" of a contract is missing. Also missing is how to create a contract from within a contract. Right now the only description of sending messages is for functions, which means sending a message to self... This should be generalized to sending messages to other contracts too.
There is actually serpent syntax for declaring in one contract an interface for calling another contract. So we should give an example for doing that.
The notion of a "name" of a contract is missing. Also missing is how to create a contract from within a contract. Right now the only description of sending messages is for functions, which means sending a message to self... This should be generalized to sending messages to other contracts too.
There is actually serpent syntax for declaring in one contract an interface for calling another contract. So we should give an example for doing that.