Do not sort atoms when a Go model is requested. This is for sure a quick patch but seeing that the Go model makes pretty strict assumptions about what order beads and Go sites can be in, I think it will be not too much of a problem.
@pckroon I think because we now have 8.999 on pylint and somehow the added code brings it down. Note exactly sure why though. to me the added lines are lint conform
Do not sort atoms when a Go model is requested. This is for sure a quick patch but seeing that the Go model makes pretty strict assumptions about what order beads and Go sites can be in, I think it will be not too much of a problem.