I would like to use this toolkit within an analysis workflow I am developing. The nature of the analysis requires the graph be in GFA 1.0 format for reasons I won't go into. However, supplying a GFA 1.0 as input to gaftools index causes a crash, and looking into the code shows that rGFA is, indeed, baked in, as it were.
I am wondering if there are technical reasons rGFA is used and GFA 1.0 is not supported. This constraint prevents applying gaftools to any genomics analyses that require haplotype information, which is a pretty big limitation. Any thoughts?
I would like to use this toolkit within an analysis workflow I am developing. The nature of the analysis requires the graph be in GFA 1.0 format for reasons I won't go into. However, supplying a GFA 1.0 as input to
gaftools index
causes a crash, and looking into the code shows that rGFA is, indeed, baked in, as it were.I am wondering if there are technical reasons rGFA is used and GFA 1.0 is not supported. This constraint prevents applying gaftools to any genomics analyses that require haplotype information, which is a pretty big limitation. Any thoughts?