Closed eworm-de closed 1 year ago
This looks very trivial, please, ninewise, merge.
Wouldn’t it be better to maintain the Dockerfile in a special repo, please? This makes unnecessary churn because of technology with questionable value to most users (how many users of vis use it via Docker?) and putting unnecessary pressure on already overworked maintainers. Besides, the image is not even published on any public hub, so what it is good for anybody?
@ninewise, @martanne ?
This is really trivial... Just pressing the merge button is all we need. 😜
But seriously... Mostly this is just bumping the version. If build breaks I will handle this - which makes the above apply.
Applied on good faith: I'm not willing to install docker just to test this.
I do agree with mcepl that it's a bit weird to have a dockerfile for vis in the main repository.
Thanks!
Well, it goes hand in hand with vis-single.c
and more bits. No idea how easy it is to put all needed code in a separate repository.
This requires one extra package, as static liblzma (liblzma.a) was moved to xz-static.