I apologize in advanced for reporting another issue...
Attached is a text file that contains random ranking of these group of lipid species (Cer m18:0, Cer m18:1 Cer d18:0, Cer d18:1)
Ceramide_RandomRanking.txt
There are two things to report here.
I have input these results onto LION and this is what I saw when I download the report from the enrichment table and opened the LION-enrichment-detailed-job.csv file.
Correct me if I am wrong but it seems that all 23 of the input lipids are classified under N-acylsphingosines (ceramides) [SP0201]
Hi,
I apologize in advanced for reporting another issue...
Attached is a text file that contains random ranking of these group of lipid species (Cer m18:0, Cer m18:1 Cer d18:0, Cer d18:1) Ceramide_RandomRanking.txt
There are two things to report here.
I have input these results onto LION and this is what I saw when I download the report from the enrichment table and opened the LION-enrichment-detailed-job.csv file.
Correct me if I am wrong but it seems that all 23 of the input lipids are classified under N-acylsphingosines (ceramides) [SP0201]
However looking at LIPIDMAPS, https://www.lipidmaps.org/data/structure/LMSDSearch.php?Mode=ProcessClassSearch&LMID=LMSP0202 and https://www.lipidmaps.org/data/structure/LMSDSearch.php?Mode=ProcessClassSearch&LMID=LMSP0201 and https://www.lipidmaps.org/data/structure/LMSDSearch.php?Mode=ProcessClassSearch&LMID=LMSP00
Shouldn't species
In addition, the LipidOntology has fatty acid m18:0 and m18:1 in the database.
Unfortunately, the smart matching is unable to correct allocated them to the Cer m18:0 and Cer m18:1 species