search

martin-fleck / cra-ttc2016

The Class Responsibility Assignment Case for the Transformation Tool Contest 2016
3 stars 2 forks source link

Peer Review Phase #6

Open azuendorf opened 8 years ago

azuendorf commented 8 years ago

Dear organizers,

when does the peer review phase start and how is it organzied.

I really want to see how good the other contributions are :) 

 Albert
fikovnik commented 8 years ago

In a few moment, we are just in the middle of preparation. I'm really sorry about the delay, but we had to chase one submission which has delayed the whole process.

Rubyfi commented 8 years ago

Hey there, it is a little confusing as to which solutions you are expected to review.

Do you have to review the solutions that are listed in the row of your own solution, or are you supposed to review the ones where you are listed as an opponent?

Best regards, Stefan

fikovnik commented 8 years ago

Sorry for the confusion, you are supposed to review the ones you are listed as opponent.

n-a-sz commented 8 years ago

Hey, I made a google sheet for all the results. It's editable to anyone so feel free to improve it.

manuelWimmer commented 8 years ago

Hi all!

Thanks for collecting all the results. Seems very interesting!

Just a short update on the MOMoT solutions we gave as a first orientation for the case study. In the meantime, we found better solutions as documented by the readme file (https://github.com/martin-fleck/cra-ttc2016/blob/master/README.md), but we forgot to update the PDF document. We will do this by tomorrow.

We are looking forward to discuss your solutions at TTC 2016 in Vienna!

Cheers, Manuel

Von: András Szabolcs Nagy [mailto:notifications@github.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 19:55 An: martin-fleck/cra-ttc2016 cra-ttc2016@noreply.github.com Betreff: Re: [martin-fleck/cra-ttc2016] Peer Review Phase (#6)

Hey, I made a google sheet for all the resultshttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EHSckNB5O2QB9Bkl7Kqjn35tBoMzUpwjHpQGAMzx4ME/edit#gid=0. It's editable to anyone so feel free to improve it.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/martin-fleck/cra-ttc2016/issues/6#issuecomment-221347032

dstrueber commented 8 years ago

Hi András, thanks, that's an excellent idea and will surely make things easier for the remaining reviews. We have inserted the missing values for the Henshin solution.