JosefUIBK
commented
1 year ago Hello Martin
you can subscribe me for yout newsletter. I am working at the University of Innsbruck and we are working on BIM2BEM (Building Energy Modelling) or BEPS (Building Energy Performance Simulation) workflows with IFC as exchange format. So basically we are using the xBIM toolkit for writing IFC Export and Inport Plugin and for Rule Based Validations.
Right now it would be interesting if xBIM Toolkit is supporting IDS (Information Delivery Specifications). On the buildingSMART GitGub page it said yes, but as far as i know it's only "somehow" supporting MVD. For us it would be interesting to have a tool or framework to extend the buildingSMART standardized View like Reference VIew, Design Transfer View with our specfici rules.
Sincerely
Josef
Universität Innsbruck Institut für Konstruktion und Materialwissenschaften Arbeitsbereich Energieeffizientes Bauen Josef Miller MSc Technikerstraße 13, 6020 Innsbruck Mobil +43 676 xxx Telefon +43 512 507-63611
Von: Martin Černý @.***> Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2023 10:03:22 An: martin1cerny/XbimCommunity Cc: Miller, Josef; Mention Betreff: [martin1cerny/XbimCommunity] Xbim Toolkit Community (Issue #528)
Hi @JosefUIBKhttps://github.com/JosefUIBK,
I hope you are well. I'm sending you this message because you’ve previously used one of our xbim Toolkit GitHub repositorieshttps://github.com/xBimTeam. I hope you are still using it and it serves you well.
If you are interested in keeping up to date with the latest news and updates to Toolkit, you can subscribe to our Toolkit newsletterhttps://share.hsforms.com/1IQizWxh-SGCOQ0CQnikEJw3myli?github_profile=JosefUIBK. We tend to send it once a month or less.
As a member of the xbim developers community, you might be interested in the development roadmaphttps://github.com/orgs/xBimTeam/projects/2/views/1 as well. We're working on IFC 4.3 at the moment, which adds support for intrastructure like railways, highways, tunnels, bridges and ports. We should see these coming as IFC files soon.
As the Toolkit is open source, we know very little about how it is used. But we are always keen to find out. If you have an interesting use-case, and you don't mind sharing, we would be excited to learn more. Feel free to get in @.***?subject=Re:%20Xbim%20Toolkit%20Community%20%28JosefUIBK%29>.
Best regards,
Martin Cerny @.**@.?subject=Re:%20Xbim%20Toolkit%20Community%20%28JosefUIBK%29> https://www.linkedin.com/in/martin-cerny/ https://xbim.nethttps://xbim.net?utm_campaign=toolkit_users&utm_medium=github_message&utm_source=github
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/martin1cerny/XbimCommunity/issues/528, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGV7UZGPKLD3ARLJ46Z254LWUOFNVANCNFSM6AAAAAAUIONWJY. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Hi @JosefUIBK,
I hope you are well. I'm sending you this message because you’ve previously used one of our xbim Toolkit GitHub repositories. I hope you are still using it and it serves you well.
If you are interested in keeping up to date with the latest news and updates to Toolkit, you can subscribe to our Toolkit newsletter. We tend to send it once a month or less.
As a member of the xbim developers community, you might be interested in the development roadmap as well. We're working on IFC 4.3 at the moment, which adds support for intrastructure like railways, highways, tunnels, bridges and ports. We should see these coming as IFC files soon.
As the Toolkit is open source, we know very little about how it is used. But we are always keen to find out. If you have an interesting use-case, and you don't mind sharing, we would be excited to learn more. Feel free to get in touch.
Best regards,
Martin Cerny martin.cerny@xbim.net https://www.linkedin.com/in/martin-cerny/ https://xbim.net