alexholcombe
commented
3 years ago that makes sense to reorder the list. I wonder if "author list as APA text" might be slightly better if it were "annotated author list". I'm concerned that "author list" sounds too simple, like there isn't any value added really - the affiliations (which is what "annotated" refers to) make it significant. But maybe many people don't kmnow what "annotated" means! Also I wasn't sure we should include "APA" to not repel those not in a field close to psychology, who don't know what APA means, but who can probably use the format anywa.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:21 AM Julien Colomb @.***> wrote:
I think it would make more sense to have it:
- Text to copy
- author list as APA text
- contribution text
- funding text
- computer readable exports
- yaml (papaya)
- Jats-XML
or simpler:
- author list as APA text
- contribution text
- funding text
- yaml (papaya)
- Jats-XML
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/marton-balazs-kovacs/tenzing/issues/58, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGYKTUR5TQNISB5X4WYTEDTSE3GHANCNFSM46PPO2YA .
-- Alex Holcombe | Professor School of Psychology | Faculty of Science The University of Sydney Web https://sydney.edu.au/science/people/alex.holcombe.php, Twitter https://twitter.com/ceptional, Map http://openwetware.org/wiki/Holcombe:Location
I think it would make more sense to have it:
or simpler: