Closed Trevoke closed 5 years ago
Hi @Trevoke . Thank you for comment.
1.Will drafts and posts be picked up in all subdirectories under the content directory?
Sorry, I don't understand. Please tell me a little more detail.
2.If I use the org-header, what is the header for a draft? Is it #+DRAFT: true ? or #+DRAFT: yes ? Or .. both .. or .. something else?
You can do it below.
3.Will drafts show up both in the list of drafts and in the list of posts?
Yes you're right. List of posts displays draft. The reason is that if I don't show drafts in list of posts, it will be slowly when there are a lot of articles. I can not think that there are 1000 drafts, but I have to assume that there are 1000 articles.
4.How do I help you test this if you need me to?
Thanks @Trevoke . It doesn't matter what format you're in, so it's helpful for me if you feel free to write anything.
Hi!
For the first question, I mean this:
content
├── drafts
│ ├── continuous-improvement.org
│ ├── cross-functional-teams-vs-multiple-queues.org
└── post
├── maintainability-is-relative.org
├── separate-manipulation-from-presentation.org
└── the-value-of-estimates-for-a-team.org
Will all of those be picked up by the tool?
Thank you for all your other answers :)
@Trevoke Thank you for the detailed explanation. In easy-jekyll, I've implemented to collect in _draft directory. In jekyll, it will become draft if put in _draft directory. But in hugo, I think that there is not much meaning because it will not be a draft without draft = true
at the front matter even if you create a directory dedicated to draft.
Although easy-hugo-list-draft (D key) can not be used in org header, if only header is hugo standard and only text is written by org mode, you can use easy-hugo-list-draft. Easy-hugo-list-draft will show the draft list all you want.
---
title: "test"
date: 2019-05-01T14:28:40+09:00
draft: true
---
Write from here in org-mode
You're right, thank you :)
Hello!
Thank you for this amazing tool. I have a few questions:
content
directory?#+DRAFT: true
? or#+DRAFT: yes
? Or .. both .. or .. something else?