Closed jbclements closed 4 months ago
Could just be iterating over the length of the original table rather than the length of the index....
Fixed in 080fb1b. Also added regression tests and also tested against the right table being filtered as well. Thanks for the bug report!
It looks to me like using table-join/inner on an example where the first table is a filtered table causes an error. For instance, when I run this code:
I get the error:
Switching the order of the table arguments yields what appears to be the correct result. It looks like you can also hack around this by converting to rows and back, restoring the index to a simple 0..n-1 vector.
Any idea what's going on here?