Closed doits closed 1 year ago
It appears that between 0.3.1 and 0.4.0, the percentile for target quality changed from 25% to 1%, so lowering your target quality value may be the correct option.
Thanks for the information. I guess it is this PR: https://github.com/master-of-zen/Av1an/pull/641
I guess I'll just test with different target qualities then again to find the optimal for me.
Basically, there are 2 things that changed:
We went from 4 frame subsampling to no frame subsampling. That makes VMAF analysis slower(not as much of a concern these days), but much more accurate.
We went from scoring the 25% worst frames to the 1% worst frames. I'd have personally set it to 5%, but MOZ wanted it that way, so I don't care :)
After upgrading to 0.4.0 I noticed the same target quality VMAF gives much lower Q. Input is a 4K 50fps HDR video of a camcorder.
This is my command line:
0.3.1
0.4.0
TLDR:
Is this shift expected with 0.4.0? Should I simply use lower target quality now (maybe
96.5
), since my older encoding with 97 where OK quality for me?