as discussed today, it would be cool to have a way for computing the UMAP of extracted features, to allow dimensionality reduction and viewing complex measurements / data points in 2D. There is a potential Java library for this:
It would be interesting to know if the library can deal with big data. If it does not, I would post-pone developing a big-data version to a later point. For now, it might be most important to have a UMAP implementation we can work with to explore possibilities. A potential alternative could also be a python-wrapper using cuML, which contains a GPU-accelerated UMAP implementation.
Optionally, we could also think of t-SNE and PCA as alternatives, if not too complicated.
Hi @stefanhahmann et al,
as discussed today, it would be cool to have a way for computing the UMAP of extracted features, to allow dimensionality reduction and viewing complex measurements / data points in 2D. There is a potential Java library for this:
It would be interesting to know if the library can deal with big data. If it does not, I would post-pone developing a big-data version to a later point. For now, it might be most important to have a UMAP implementation we can work with to explore possibilities. A potential alternative could also be a python-wrapper using cuML, which contains a GPU-accelerated UMAP implementation.
Optionally, we could also think of t-SNE and PCA as alternatives, if not too complicated.
Let me know what you think!
Best, Robert