Open FGRibreau opened 7 years ago
Hi @FGRibreau !
No plugin system planned yet :).
Mjml is a framework, Hermes is not. Basically, Hermes is just Golang HTML templates describing typical emails ^^ (containing optional button, table, and so on). It's not meant to be as flexible as Mjml. User defines data and theme displays data as it wants.
Without any plugin system, a simple idea could be to add a Chart
in Email.Body
. But, every built-in theme will have to implement charts.
Can you give us more details of your idea and how it would be used with Hermes ? Do you want to include charts with your https://image-charts.com service ?
Without any plugin system, a simple idea could be to add a Chart in Email.Body. But, every built-in theme will have to implement charts.
Yes, that would be nice, who does not want to add charts to reports ? :)
Can you give us more details of your idea and how it would be used with Hermes ?
I could think of somthing like this:
type Chart struct {
params map[string]string
}
Note that we could generate automatically generate the struct from the swagger/openapi specification like we did for mjml-chart thus offering automatic documentation and tests :) But it would be better as an plugin (so we could automatically update it) since here it's not planned it might not be the best idea ^^
Do you want to include charts with your https://image-charts.com service ?
That's why we created image-charts in the first place indeed, it was to hard for each project to setup server-side chart rendering, storage and scaling.
I think chart addition would be great !
Although, I think Chart
struct should be more service-agnostic as possible, meaning it should contains points or something, not just params (it may not be possible depending on the kind of chart ?).
Maybe using an interface instead of struct would be nice, meaning we could have a plugin-like system.
Next step would be to propose a Chart
type here, then community could debate on it 👍
Hi @matcornic !
Although, I think Chart struct should be more service-agnostic as possible, meaning it should contains points or something, not just params (it may not be possible depending on the kind of chart ?).
As you can see, it highly depends on the backend, Image-Charts follows Google Image Charts API so we could be our attributes on that but that does a LOT of attributes (the good news is we could definitely generate the Chart struct from the swagger.json spec and only keep the completely compatible parameters between the two (just like we did in mjml-chart) and offer a way to change the endpoint so the deprecated Google Image Charts and Image-Charts will be supported.
What do you think?
@FGRibreau I think this is the way to go 😉
Seeing the (big) swagger spec, I think that some fields don't need to be in the final struct. Just keep it as simple as possible, with convention over configuration principle in mind. I don't want the users to be overwhelmed with an overcomplicated Chart
struct.
Thank you again for your proposal. I assign you to the issue 😛
Here is a first try:
type Chart struct {
// (optional) Image-Charts or Google Image Charts endpoint
endpoint string
// (required) chart type
cht string
// (required) chart data
chd string
// (optional) text format custom scaling
chds string
// (optional) output fake format
chof string
// (required) chart size
chs string
// (optional) text for each series, to display in the legend
chdl string
// (optional) chart legend text and style
chdls string
// (optional) grid lines
chg string
// (optional) series colors
chco string
// (optional) chart title
chtt string
// (optional) chart title colors and font size
chts string
// (optional) line thickness and solid/dashed style
chls string
// (optional) pie chart labels
chl string
// (optional) Background Fills
chf string
// (optional) gif configuration
chan string
// (optional) doughnut chart inside label
chli string
// (optional) image-charts enterprise `account_id`
icac string
// (optional) HMAC-SHA256 signature
ichm string
// (optional) Force watermark display even if the chart was signed with an enterprise account
icwt bool
}
I used this simple JS code to generate it:
console.log(`
type Chart struct {
// (optional) Image-Charts or Google Image Charts endpoint
endpoint string
${swagger.paths['/chart'].get.parameters
.filter(x => x['x-meta'].implementation.status === 'COMPLETE')
.map(x => ` // (${x.required ? 'required' : 'optional'}) ${x.description}\n ${x.name} ${x.type === 'boolean' ? 'bool' : x.type}`)
.join('\n')}
}`);
I'm not a go expert, so I did not generate the constructor but it will only asks for the required values (cht, chd and chs) and it will validate through regexp (extracted from swagger schema) the specified value
Ok Nice ! You may have to set struct properties as public for them to be available in the Go templating. (Just uppercase the first letter) I'm not sure private functions and properties are available Or maybe easier, create a public function on Chart type, rendering the needed URL, and just use this function in the template.
Note: I'm on holidays for a week, so I probably won't be able to help you until then 🌎🌍🌏
Hello @matcornic,
Oh did not see that you were from Rennes! (I'm from Nantes) are you going to Breizh Camp? I will!
@FGRibreau So will I ;)
Awesome, see you there! I will give 2 talks there "Construire et automatiser l'ecosystème de son SaaS grâce à une spécification Swagger" & "Une API REST et GraphQL sans code grâce à Postgrest, Sub0 et PostgreSQL", hope to see you there !
Hello !
Is a plugin system planned on Hermes roadmap? :)
I would live to develop one to add support for image charts to hermes. (like I did for mjml with mjml-charts)