In line 115 of the train function the labels with anomalies marked as self.args.num_classes + 1 is marked on those positions as self.args.num_classes. For the cityscapes dataset this would mean setting the class at the pasted positions to 19, which is class unlabeled, or rather the class ignored when computing the cost.
In line 115 of the train function the labels with anomalies marked as
self.args.num_classes + 1
is marked on those positions asself.args.num_classes
. For the cityscapes dataset this would mean setting the class at the pasted positions to 19, which is classunlabeled
, or rather the class ignored when computing the cost.Is this right?