materialdigital / core-ontology

The PMD Core Ontology (PMDco) official release repository
12 stars 10 forks source link

Discussion, why is prov-o et al not included via owl include or prefixed? #21

Closed Kibubu closed 1 year ago

Kibubu commented 1 year ago

Why are there parts of prov-o scattered around the pmd-core-ttl?

Is there a reason not to use https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#imports-def or at least group included ontologies.

https://github.com/materialdigital/core-ontology/blob/b7e2cd03baaf4eb3520690ec465080e1a7fbb262/pmdco_core.ttl#L3139-L3150

joergwa commented 1 year ago

We did not import prov-o explicitly to keep the Protégé view more simple.