Open pi8027 opened 1 year ago
I thought that the point of fun_scope
is to locally increase the priority of the notations defined in fun_scope
in a context where a function is expected, e.g., the third argument of map
. However, many of them actually have function_scope
defined in the Coq standard library.
About map.
map : forall {T1 T2 : Type}, (T1 -> T2) -> seq T1 -> seq T2
map is not universe polymorphic
Arguments map {T1 T2}%type_scope f%function_scope s%seq_scope
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
map is transparent
Expands to: Constant mathcomp.ssreflect.seq.map
Shouldn't we declare Bind Scope fun_scope with Funclass.
to fix it, or even deprecate fun_scope
and replace it with function_scope
to unify them?
https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/blob/082c28dc6562c3d947d52b74bd2a6bb592941562/mathcomp/ssreflect/order.v#L1265-L1266 It also seems to apply here: https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/blob/082c28dc6562c3d947d52b74bd2a6bb592941562/mathcomp/algebra/ssralg.v#L6203-L6210