Example of inductive specs at chapter 5 uses variable named n in the hypothesis, but refers to m in the proof (ubnPgeq m).
I changed n to m and not the other way around, because it gives nicer output (Coq 8.13.0, Mathcomp 1.12.0).
When variable is m: forall n : nat, n <= m -> G n
When variable is n: forall n0 : nat, n0 <= n -> G n0
Hello!
Example of inductive specs at chapter 5 uses variable named
n
in the hypothesis, but refers tom
in the proof (ubnPgeq m
). I changedn
tom
and not the other way around, because it gives nicer output (Coq 8.13.0, Mathcomp 1.12.0). When variable ism
:forall n : nat, n <= m -> G n
When variable isn
:forall n0 : nat, n0 <= n -> G n0