mathematicalmichael / jsm19

Poster presentation for Tian Yu Yen and Michael Pilosov for the Joint Statistical Meeting 2019.
Other
1 stars 0 forks source link

Content Discussion #3

Closed mathematicalmichael closed 5 years ago

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

Tian:

Here's my rough idea for what would be good. I was thinking a sort of 3-panel organization with one panel for basic Data Consistent info, one panel for parameter identification, and one panel for solving parameter distribution-type problems under uncertainty. Something like this:

  1. Parameter ID
  2. DCI
  3. Distribution Problems

I think the overall main idea would be basic theory in the middle, then more example-like stuff on the two side panels.

One of the goals that I want to get across is how DCI can be used to solve different kinds of problems in comparison to Statistical Bayes. On the param identify panel, it would be nice to show these similarities and differences (I think this panel would be your focus since you have more familiarity with communicating these nuances). On the distribution panel I want to show a comparison between a hierarchical Bayes model and DCI, because I think that is a fair comparison.

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

six segments.

Bayesian Inference updates prior information with a data-likelihood function.

Data-Consistent Inversion updates an initial distribution by inverting a measure constructed from data.

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

I will go ahead and re-structure the document so that we can have a middle-column .tex file and then four more .tex files, one for each outer section.

This way, if we decide to swap order (columns have individual methods instead of problem types), we can avoid all copy/pasting.

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

Okay... my to-do is to re-structure the poster and get the skeleton of it in place.

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

@yentyu

yentyu commented 5 years ago

I did a draft of columns 1 & 2: re-ordering some things and moving figures around.

As a draft, it is more or less finished. Everything that I think should be on the left is there.

@mathematicalmichael: Would you take a look at it sometime on Monday and see if there are any big issues, things that are missing / need to be re-framed or cut?

Otherwise, column 3 and all of the final space adjusting is what is left.

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

no big issues, just small things

I pushed them to a new branch called edits for your review (git diff?) or maybe I'll submit a PR.

Happy with how your plots look but I would consider grabbing the colors used in my notebook so they match on both sides. I dunno.. just my visual aesthetic nagging at me desiring symmetry. Though the colors you chose are readable.

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

poster.pdf

yentyu commented 5 years ago

Merged your changes. Thanks for them!

Is "Simple Bayes" really the language?

Changed to "Regular Bayes"

Colors

Couldn't use your colors and get the plots to actually not look horrendous. Ack! Too bad I am bad at color palettes. Gonna ignore this, just for time's sake.

not sure what you meant by needs edit, but I assumed you meant that you wanted the full-version of the images (these just had ten samples for expediency), so thats what I changed with respect to images.

Convergence of DCI plot is fine.

For the "Comparison to Bayes" plots, we either need to change title or change concept. I thought we were going for the same type of plots but one column was DCI and other column was Stat Bayes (what I am calling regular Bayes). 2 plots in each column, for one for 10 and one for 100 datapoints (ignore 1 and 50). I also liked your sparse plots.

QR code status per #4 ?

Continuing discussion in #4 .

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

oh wow I actually didn't notice the "Comparison to Bayes" column heading had changed. I literally just replaced the plots with what was there before. Now I think I understand.

So, I think I understand. Bottom four plots on my end need to be swapped out. Two of the four remain (D=10 and 100). Then I simply add the posterior*.png images to the figures. Got it. PR forthcoming.

TITLE: We need to be consistent.

Does wikipedia have an opinion?

I think the label P.f. update has enough room to become Pushforward? Should be "pushforward updated" to be grammatically consistent with "predictive"

yentyu commented 5 years ago

I merged and made small edits to everything I feel needs editing.

I feel satisfied with everything: if see anything that needs small edits, feel free to make it happen. Otherwise, I think we're done!

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

Can I move our names to the bottom? As it is, the title is tooooo squished to the top.

Still have to fix references?

Also I got it working in a binder with pyMC3 now!

And fixed the make errors.

One reference will be to this repo, another to troy's paper, perhaps another to BET.

yentyu commented 5 years ago

I thought you already fixed the references. My bad!

I feel a little uncomfortable moving the names to the bottom only, since I feel like most people will expect to see the names under the title. I am happy for you to make the names small under the title though, if that makes more sense!

Thanks Michael!

-Tian Yu

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:17 PM Michael Pilosov notifications@github.com wrote:

Can I move our names to the bottom? As it is, the title is tooooo squished to the top.

Still have to fix references?

Also I got it working in a binder with pyMC3 now!

And fixed the make errors.

One reference will be to this repo, another to troy's paper, perhaps another to BET.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mathematicalmichael/jsm19/issues/3?email_source=notifications&email_token=AG5YQV7ME7U6HUK2F2EWVZ3QA6USJA5CNFSM4HPR7JZKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD2U322Q#issuecomment-514440554, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG5YQV7JUQQRFFAQ4E4Z2P3QA6USJANCNFSM4HPR7JZA .

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

hmmm. well, for some reason the color thing messed up my compilation, so I removed it and am not a fan of how it looks now. That kind of edit should be made in the sty file. At the very least we should put our university (maybe CU Denver for space) in the same line as authors.

yentyu commented 5 years ago

Feel free to send me a pdf copy if you want a 2nd pair of eyes.

-Tian Yu

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:48 AM Michael Pilosov notifications@github.com wrote:

hmmm. well, for some reason the color thing messed up my compilation, so I removed it and am not a fan of how it looks now. That kind of edit should be made in the sty file. At the very least we should put our university (maybe CU Denver for space) in the same line as authors.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mathematicalmichael/jsm19/issues/3?email_source=notifications&email_token=AG5YQVY26JZNKSNGW6HHBQLQBBTU3A5CNFSM4HPR7JZKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD2WSPGA#issuecomment-514664344, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG5YQV6FCL5UHSGH22T7EALQBBTU3ANCNFSM4HPR7JZA .

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

I'm figuring out printing, seems like I can just walk up to the printer and do it by USB. Will try today, and worst case I can do it in North classroom.

yentyu commented 5 years ago

Cool. Thanks!

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

jsm19poster.pdf

mathematicalmichael commented 5 years ago

wow, caught a lot of spacing things I could improve in < 1 hour jsm19poster.pdf

THE SYMMETRY IN THE POSTER IS SO ON POINT NOW!!!!

yentyu commented 5 years ago

thumbs up!

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:13 PM Michael Pilosov notifications@github.com wrote:

wow, caught a lot of spacing things I could improve in < 1 hour jsm19poster.pdf https://github.com/mathematicalmichael/jsm19/files/3428778/jsm19poster.pdf

THE SYMMETRY IN THE POSTER IS SO ON POINT NOW!!!!

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mathematicalmichael/jsm19/issues/3?email_source=notifications&email_token=AG5YQV563SDTO6P43R3OLPLQBDAY5A5CNFSM4HPR7JZKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD2XUG5A#issuecomment-514802548, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG5YQV54OKB52FZ5FNKLUG3QBDAY5ANCNFSM4HPR7JZA .