Closed mathematicalmichael closed 2 years ago
Merging #51 (8d1d287) into main (1580c30) will increase coverage by
0.01%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #51 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 77.92% 77.93% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 14 14
Lines 1803 1804 +1
Branches 237 237
==========================================
+ Hits 1405 1406 +1
Misses 313 313
Partials 85 85
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/mud_examples/poisson.py | 84.75% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/mud_examples/pde.py | 73.38% <100.00%> (+0.21%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1580c30...8d1d287. Read the comment docs.
sd = 0.05
with500
measurements and1000
samples. purple = mud from qoi created by split in the middle blue = use SVD on scaled residuals to discover weighting for definition of new QoIhowever the colorbars there differ, as we can see by looking at the absolute values instead of the relative ones that result from the color-scaling per axis:
this indicates that the first QoI is more or less a mean-value of the sensors (weighing some samples more than others, but overall with very low variation), and the second QoI is incorporating information from the top/bottom halves, lining up nicely with our intuition about splitting the domain into horizontal slices.
If we look at our QoI response surfaces, we can see that we now have a map with orthogonal contours (in the eyeball norm)...