Closed tomByrer closed 10 years ago
I pinged @elsigh about it a few days ago. It's on his todo.
I'm closing this as it's not really our bug.
I agree the issue is on his end... Do you think that jsPerf could buffer results, so when Browserscope goes down, at least the results are available?
I don't think that'll happen, the whole point to using a third party like Browserscope, is to shift the burden & load to them.
shift the burden & load to them
How true, thanks for the feedback! I'll have to mentally note to record results somewhere when it is high-priority.
I'll have to mentally note to record results somewhere when it is high-priority.
No worries, I think this issue is only temporary.
I hope so, I'm trying to help optimize a program by proving a utility script is faster than another.... maybe you heard of it, it is called low-dash or something? ;)
Right on. I should have a fix in place soon On Dec 27, 2013 7:27 PM, "tomByrer" notifications@github.com wrote:
I hope so, I'm trying to help optimize a programhttps://github.com/giakki/uncss/issues/16by proving a utility script is faster than another.... maybe you heard of it, it is called low-dash or something? ;)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/mathiasbynens/jsperf.com/issues/162#issuecomment-31289271 .
This has happened a few times the past few days. Not sure of a good fix-action, maybe buffering results? Or be able to turn off automatic result reads? (I often will test the same case on several browsers, & don't care about seeing results until the 4th-6th run-through. Or I flip though several different revisions of the same case to see differences.)
I sent an email to @stevesouders as well.