A Numbas user has reported some bad positioning in IE when using the \large command.
I've narrowed it down to the fact that we use the Latin Modern font - the default TeX font doesn't have this problem.
I've made an example at https://codepen.io/christianp/pen/VMbrRj, basically consisting of the TeX string \large{\frac{2 b}{a} + \frac{5 a}{b}}. In that Codepen, I've put a version with \displaystyle instead of \large underneath - it doesn't produce the same problem.
Here's how it looks in IE 10 with MathJax 2.7.2 on my machine:
It looks like the whole rendering has been shifted down a bit, so the bottom half is outside the clipping box.
A Numbas user has reported some bad positioning in IE when using the
\large
command. I've narrowed it down to the fact that we use the Latin Modern font - the default TeX font doesn't have this problem.I've made an example at https://codepen.io/christianp/pen/VMbrRj, basically consisting of the TeX string
\large{\frac{2 b}{a} + \frac{5 a}{b}}
. In that Codepen, I've put a version with\displaystyle
instead of\large
underneath - it doesn't produce the same problem.Here's how it looks in IE 10 with MathJax 2.7.2 on my machine:
It looks like the whole rendering has been shifted down a bit, so the bottom half is outside the clipping box.