Consider to merge MathNet.Numerics.FSharp into MathNet.Numerics

mathnet / mathnet-numerics

Math.NET Numerics

http://numerics.mathdotnet.com

MIT License

3.45k stars 891 forks source link

Consider to merge MathNet.Numerics.FSharp into MathNet.Numerics #496

Open cdrnet opened 7 years ago

cdrnet commented 7 years ago

Advantages:

Simpler usage from F# (single package and assembly only)
Functionaility currently implemented in .Fsharp available for all users
Freedom to implement more functionality in F# yet still have it available for all users

Drawbacks:

Dependency on Fsharp.Core NuGet package for all users
The .Fsharp package currently supports less framework targets

CyberQin commented 7 years ago

yes!it's acceptable to add fsharpcore since it's cross-platform.By the way,net standard2.0preview is released

cdrnet commented 7 years ago

Yes, I think it would not be a blocking issue.

iamcarbon commented 7 years ago

Would this mean re-targeting everything to .NETSTANDARD?

cdrnet commented 7 years ago

It would indeed mean we'd have to reduce the supported targets to those supported by Fsharp.Core (which has started to focus on .Net Standard and newer .Net Framework only); unless we'd split/ifdef, so only those supporting Fsharp.Core would depend on Fsharp.Core and include those features (which would restrict us on where we can use it)