Similar to #1106. Since I have no insight into what causes this, I don't know if this has been resolved by e94139c4d777fb9692574c6b6784a08c8d04ec63. If so, I apologize for the duplicate and instead ask whether we can expect a release that includes this patch soon since it was committed back in early January.
Say we are for example dealing with complex numbers and the correct answer to a question would be (3/2)i. If you enter that or (3/2)*i or 3/2i, validation produces similar TeX gibberish to this:
if unknown then sconcat("\\left(",tex1(3/2),"\\right)") else (if atom(3/2) or is(length(args(a)) = 1) or safe_op(3/2) = "^" then tex1(3/2) else sconcat("\\left(",tex1(3/2),"\\right)"))\, \mathrm{i}
The answer still seems to be understood correctly. Just the validation output is nonsense.
If you want, I can send you the offending question as XML.
Similar to #1106. Since I have no insight into what causes this, I don't know if this has been resolved by e94139c4d777fb9692574c6b6784a08c8d04ec63. If so, I apologize for the duplicate and instead ask whether we can expect a release that includes this patch soon since it was committed back in early January.
Say we are for example dealing with complex numbers and the correct answer to a question would be
(3/2)i
. If you enter that or(3/2)*i
or3/2i
, validation produces similar TeX gibberish to this:The answer still seems to be understood correctly. Just the validation output is nonsense.
If you want, I can send you the offending question as XML.
We are on Moodle
4.3.4
and STACK4.5.0
.